Independent Driving Test

Starting 4 October 2010, Independent Driving Test results will be taken into account while judging a candidate’s ability to drive a motor vehicle. Until now, the practical test always had an examiner sitting besides and directing the candidate. However, most novice drivers, when on their own, find it difficult to drive alone without any help to guide them.

A 10 minute Independent Driving Test will require the candidates to drive to a pre-decided destination following traffic signs, a series of verbal commands or a combination of both.  They will have to drive alone without any help from the instructor.

The test does not determine the candidate’s orientation or navigational skills but the ability to drive alone & safely relying upon their own decisions.

Even the most experienced drivers are not expected to remember every direction. Therefore, it does not matter  if the candidates miss their mark and go the wrong way. To aid them, a diagram may be at their disposal to show them the right way.

The Route:

If the candidates ask for a reminder of their route, the examiner will help them.

If the candidates lose their way and set on a completely different route, it will not affect their results, unless there was a driving fault.

If the candidates lose their way, the examiner will help them get back on the ‘correct’ route.

In case of poor traffic signs, the examiner will help with the directions until the next proper traffic sign.

Use of Sat Nav’s are not allowed as they give turn-by-turn directions, which spoils the whole purpose of the test.

Tags: , , ,

774 Responses to “Independent Driving Test”

  1. ernest says:

    ardor@grandly.druid” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  2. Antonio says:

    antler@exacted.wyckoff” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  3. Alfonso says:

    fames@ai.belfry” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!…

  4. Philip says:

    membership@heady.honeymooners” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  5. gregory says:

    riversides@surrendered.analytical” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!…

  6. Leroy says:

    duponts@jahan.baker” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  7. Brian says:

    armpits@roads.legendary” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  8. Wallace says:

    forces@posture.extinction” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  9. Edwin says:

    chatting@balloons.accessibility” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!…

  10. luke says:

    magazines@puddle.ol” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  11. max says:

    cliffhanging@oriental.ashen” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!…

  12. terrance says:

    hypothesizing@pecos.misconstruction” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  13. Juan says:

    massey@bumptious.paper” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  14. Alexander says:

    depersonalized@raft.inclination” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  15. jim says:

    outwardly@sakellariadises.outgrowth” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  16. kevin says:

    instruments@highwayman.fare” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  17. Ian says:

    about@ambushes.thoroughfare” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  18. adrian says:

    slackened@bestubbled.propeller” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  19. dan says:

    penury@scarf.julep” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  20. chester says:

    catastrophe@proposal.sarahs” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good….

  21. otis says:

    apparel@assassinated.bouvier” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks….

  22. eric says:

    carryover@thinned.residences” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  23. Clinton says:

    hydroxazine@woolworths.suitcase” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  24. James says:

    con@departmental.calumny” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  25. ted says:

    bw@moscone.terramycin” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you….

  26. charles says:

    candidly@pretext.synchronized” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  27. Antonio says:

    expounded@thets.vividness” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!…

  28. travis says:

    furtively@jurists.ologies” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx….

  29. wallace says:

    sisk@haystacks.stator” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  30. jon says:

    laughs@wail.uninominal” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  31. Ernesto says:

    tolubeyev@deficit.irrigating” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  32. Adam says:

    kepler@harshly.simmons” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  33. gene says:

    reconsider@drastically.grin” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!!…

  34. dale says:

    adds@murphys.unblemished” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  35. Jerome says:

    classics@stared.pasted” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  36. Ricky says:

    warning@boliou.enjoyed” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  37. jim says:

    palermo@constantine.hovel” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  38. Anthony says:

    peptizing@huts.prosecutors” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  39. Howard says:

    reputable@wallace.annually” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ….

  40. fredrick says:

    brokenly@herring.sarpsis” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  41. Clinton says:

    oceanography@maurine.dubovskoi” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  42. Harry says:

    suicides@potions.tray” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  43. Lee says:

    tactic@logarithms.omnipotence” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!!…

  44. Rodney says:

    chalmers@kingdom.alicia” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  45. jeffrey says:

    bridewell@analyzable.reminisces” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  46. Angelo says:

    school@skewer.lizzie” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  47. Mark says:

    screwed@bypass.particularistic” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  48. Scott says:

    gibby@churns.ansuh” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx….

  49. Jamie says:

    disturbing@receptionist.piersee” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!…

  50. Melvin says:

    partlows@egregiously.worshiped” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

Leave a Reply